Designing the Student Research Placement Microbiology Bachelors (FHEQ Level 5) (QAA 3, 5, 7)

Designing the Student Research Placement Microbiology Bachelors (FHEQ Level 5) (QAA 3, 5, 7)

Group Size ? 1.) Small group (teams of 4-6)
2.) Individual Task
3.) Large Group
4.) Any

Small group (teams of 4-6)

Learning Environment ? 1.) Lecture Theatre
2.) Presentation Space
3.) Carousel Tables (small working group)
4.) Any
5.) Outside
6.) Special

Carousel Tables (small working group)

QAA Enterprise Theme(s) ? 1.) Creativity and Innovation
2.) Opportunity recognition, creation and evaluation
3.) Decision making supported by critical analysis and judgement
4.) Implementation of ideas through leadership and management
5.) Reflection and Action
6.) Interpersonal Skills
7.) Communication and Strategy

3Decision making supported by critical analysis and judgement 5Reflection and Action 7Communication and Strategy

Objective:

  • To design a research strategy for a summer laboratory studentship project 
  • To investigate the research background, experimental methods and timescales to achieve a set of aims
  • To understand the research process and appreciate the contingencies required for real world research 
  • To engage in decision making and problem solving 
  • To evidence the power of group work as students peer learn and present together

Introduction:

This activity works really well with students supporting each other to achieve a professional/research level challenge. It builds their confidence and understanding of their practice and gives them wider confidence across the whole of their studies.

The focus within this task is to stimulate team building and decision making through the research process.

Within this task, students will work together to explain their findings to group peers as they understand them and progress the plan as a group. (Some students may later undertake a summer studentship so they have been prepared for the situation as a result of this authentic assessment).

Activity:

This task was based in Microbiology (Stage 2; Level 5) but would be accessible to any discipline where a research strategy will be required. It is typically given to the students “early” in their programme of studies. This creates a clear challenge but one that is highly relevant to their career and academic interests.

By placing the students into groups, issue the aims and introduction from a real research studentship (available from HEIs or via colleagues) and issue the task to design the activities required for the eight week research summer project.

This challenge is complex for the groups to address and requires them to utilise peer learning to understand what is required. Your role as tutor can beadjusted, depending upon the needs of the group, but it is suggested that you present yourself as a ‘resource’ to their learning, rather than ‘the guide to’ their learning.

You may wish to include regular contact time which could involve:

  • an ice-breaker session (short tasks to develop analytical reasoning, team-decision making and reflection)
  • a process of research session, looking at examples previously encountered and how these were approached,
  • optional drop-in sessions (x2) to validate their ideas (which can be tutor-led or working groups that create peer review and comment).

Students prepare a one page summary on their approach and what part of the project they researched.  They also present their group studentship plan as a short group presentation (10 mins).  Questions and comments from other groups should be welcomed, with the aim of enhancing their approach and improving their work through this final opportunity for peer-review and tutor comment.

Impact:

The impact was significant across the whole of Stage 2.  It gives them a lot of confidence to develop their skills and has clearly impacted positively ontheir overall performance.  It was clearly a challenge to the groups, but achieving this project, and seeing the learning of other groups, really impacted upon their approach and professional confidence. 

Learning Outcome:

This task helps the students develop the mind-set of a researcher; questioning why and how for each experiment, and evaluating feasibility with respect to cost and time. Usually students would not develop these skills until postgraduate studies level so this encourages students to develop key skills early (so they may be utilised or referred to in an employability context).

Key skills include

  • Research and interpretation skills 
  • Decision making 
  • Resources 
  • Communication – formative with peers and summative through assessment
  • Budgeting and time management 
  • Delegation and leadership skills 

However it is important that you draw out this learning within their presentation or within a final group discussion. It might also be helpful to review the ‘changed’ role of you as tutor, in directing the journey of their learning, and providing opportunities for review and enhancements, rather than immediately resolving their problems.

You can also explore with the groups how the decisions were made and resources accessed, exploring social networks as well as traditional academic resources (Guides; texts etc). Those that contacted senior researchers or their subject club/society may have drawn on expertise and experience and thisproject encourages them to access support as widely as needed. It also gives the opportunity to review and evaluate sources, and comment upon the validity of different materials.

References:

Author/Contact Details:

  • Dr Carys Watts, School of Biomedical Sciences, Newcastle University

 

 

About the Author
This guide was produced by Dr Carys Watts (School of Biomedical Sciences, Newcastle University).